🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Documents seen by journalists sent from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the nation's political leaders demands measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a proposed legislation that include reductions in the recommended coverage of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on scented cigarette varieties, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“Were I in government, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” said the health advocate.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year succumb to smoking-associated diseases, according to WHO calculations.

The campaigner stated the letter was known to have been circulated to multiple official agencies and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside broader worries about corporate intervention with public health regulations. In recent weeks, WHO officials raised concerns that the smoking product companies was escalating campaigns to weaken global control measures.

“We see evidence of industry lobbying everywhere. Manufacturer hallmarks are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN international gathering,” said Jorge Alday.

Likely impacts

“Should anti-smoking legislation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in human lives who might potentially stop smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and requiring that graphic health warnings cover 75% of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Through correspondence, the corporation proposes this be lowered to less than half “within the WHO-FCTC suggested parameters”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the bill passes.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a alert needs to encompass at least fifty percent of the product container front “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover nearly two-thirds of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavor restrictions debate

The company seeks the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would lead smokers to “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for different infractions “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to ten-year jail sentences”.

Company justification

Via documentation, the managing director of the Zambian branch says the corporation is focused on good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but asserts that “some regulations can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “undermine this law so much that the necessary effect for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that numerous similar measures existed in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he stated.

“We exist in a global village. When I cultivate smoking products in my back yard and collect the yield and market the products – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my community's youth are perishing … is in itself total emotional failure.”

Tobacco control legislation in the United Kingdom or other countries had not caused companies to close, the advocate mentioned. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Standard business position

The company representative commented: “The company operates its operations according with applicable local laws. Further, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which allow for interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The company was “not opposed to regulation”, the representative commented, mentioning that young individuals should be shielded from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We advocate for developing rules to accomplish desired population health targets, while accepting the variety of rights and obligations on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, adding that BAT’s proposals “mirror the circumstances of the local commercial environment and cigarette sector, which includes increasing amounts of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was solicited for statement.